Warning to law firms: Stand up for the rule of law while you can
One by one, Trump is fencing in all his potential opponents. Now he’s sending a clear warning to lawyers to back off.
February 27, 2025 The Washington Post
President Donald Trump shows off a signed executive order in the Oval Office on Tuesday. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)
“Hold
it; this is a good one. Is everybody listening?” President Donald
Trump, about to sign a sheaf of executive orders, was so jazzed up about
this one he interrupted the aide explaining the document. Sharpie in
hand, Trump waved off a reporter asking about U.S. troops in Europe:
“Wait, I just want to savor this one, please.”
And
so the president of the United States signed an extraordinary document,
aimed at a single law firm — indeed, a single lawyer — for the
egregious offense of representing a client.
“Deranged
Jack Smith,” Trump declared. “We’re going to call it the Deranged Jack
Smith signing.” More formally titled “Suspension of Security Clearances
and Evaluation of Government Contracts,” the order
revoked the security clearance for Peter Koski, a Covington partner,
and called for terminating any contracts the government has with the
firm. (In fact, there aren’t any.)
Koski’s
offense? He and Lanny Breuer, another Covington partner, agreed to
represent Smith, the special counsel who investigated and indicted Trump
during the Biden era. Trump has called for jailing Smith “and his Thug
Prosecutors.”
According to a financial disclosure form
Smith filed on leaving the Justice Department, Covington has already
provided $140,000 in pro bono legal services to Smith. That unhinged the
acting U.S. attorney for the D.C., Ed Martin, who posted on X a line that bore his trademark unethical malevolence. “We’ll be in touch soon. #NoOneIsAboveTheLaw.”
Trump
has issued executive orders that are more significant and others that
are more malign. But this one encapsulates the myriad dangers that Trump
presents in his second term. He has been unleashed as never before to
operationalize his petty vindictiveness, revoking security clearances
for former intelligence officials who have crossed him and yanking
security details for other opponents.
Now,
he not only wants to deploy the Justice Department to go after Smith
but also wants to ensure Smith does not receive proper legal
representation. As Trump well knows (because his own lawyers had to
obtain security clearances to represent him in the Mar-a-Lago classified
documents case), Koski and other Covington lawyers need those
clearances to do their job as Smith’s counsel.
When
a reporter asked about the wisdom of targeting individual law firms and
lawyers, Trump made clear that retribution was his goal. “Excuse me,
I’ve been targeted for four years – longer than that,” he said. “You
don’t tell me about targeting. I was the target of corrupt politicians
for four years and then four years after that, so don’t tell me about
targeting.” There is something even more sinister going on here. Trump
is happy to exact the smallest measures of revenge against Smith and
those who would dare to help him. But this order isn’t just aimed at
Koski and Covington. It is designed to intimidate law firms considering
taking on the administration. The message of the order was clear: Do so at your peril. We will come after you.
Trump
said as much. “And you’ll be doing this with other firms as time goes
by, right?” he asked staff secretary Will Scharf. Trump invoked “the
weaponization of our system by law firms, even pro bono work they’re
doing in order to clog up government, stop government,” adding, “nobody
knows about it more than me, and hopefully, that’ll never happen again.”
Weaponization of our system.
What Trump calls weaponization is basic lawyering: firms using their
expertise and fulfilling their professional responsibility to do public
service work, whether representing individual clients free of charge or
suing the government over contested actions. As the president well
understands, advocacy groups and public interest law firms don’t have
the capacity to conduct this litigation on their own. They need the big
private firms, with their resources and personnel. Trump wants those
lawyers out of the way.
He is succeeding,
even before the executive order. The major New York law firms,
significant players in litigation against the Trump administration
during his first term, are nowhere to be found in the flood of
second-term litigation. They have privately made clear that they are not
interested in taking the risk that Trump will target them and scare off
their corporate clients, according to lawyers involved in the
litigation. Law firms are similarly reluctant to let their lawyers take
on pro bono representation of former Biden administration officials and
others who, like Smith, could be in the Trump Justice Department’s
crosshairs.
This
is of a piece with Trump’s larger strategy to dismantle or defang every
potential vector of resistance and opposition, in and outside
government. Inspectors general, fired. The special counsel (not to be
confused with prosecutors like Smith but the official entrusted with
protecting government whistleblowers), fired. Generals ousted and,
chillingly, the senior lawyers in the military branches, the ones who
could tell Trump his orders are unlawful, fired. Prosecutors and FBI
agents summarily transferred and instructed that dissent will not be
tolerated.
Outside
government, the media is instructed what language they must use (Gulf
of America) at risk of losing access. The White House Correspondents’
Association is relieved of its traditional responsibility for organizing
the media pool coverage of the president, with the White House itself
asserting the power to pick and choose among favored news organization.
This is the familiar — and terrifying — authoritarian playbook and it’s
all happening here.
Now,
the lawyers. It matters little whether Trump’s move receives front-page
coverage. He enjoys the small-minded pleasure of exacting retribution —
watch the video of Trump tossing out the signing pen, with a satisfied
snarl. “Here, why don’t you send it to Jack Smith”— and the larger bonus
of bullying potential opponents into submission
Warning to Big Law: those who fail to stand up while they can for the rule of law may rue its erosion and regret their silence.